De Pronuntionis Lex Regia Sacrorum | Pronouncement of Sacred Sovereign Law

I. This Pronouncement

i. By Right, Power and Authority of the Sovereign Rights as Pronounced by Our Prounouncement De Unitas America as a Free Sovereign of the Free Society of United America we make these further pronouncements known collectively as De Prounountionis Lex Regia Sacrorum and also known as the Prounouncement of Sacred Sovereign Law; and

ii. These Sovereign Rights may be taken in official original document form and spoken form to represent one complete set of Rights and the highest of all Original Sovereign Law with the other Pronouncements we make; and

iii. When referring to Our Sovereign Pronouncements collectively is may also be taken both in printed form and spoken word that we mean the complete and accurate set of Rights as the highest of all Original Sovereign Law.

II. The Use of Rights Pronounced as Original Law

i. By Our Right, Our Hand and our Voice we solemnly pledge our most sacred sovereign act to use these Pronouncements and all Our Sovereign Rights for the betterment of our neighbour, our community respecting at all times due process and the living law; and

ii. Whilst Our Rights may permit the strongest of remedy against an injury inflicted upon Us and to the body of the Living Law, our goal shall be at all times to present fair and proportional remedy, not to exceed fair remedy and to seek positive solutions for the benefit of all parties; and

iii. We shall at all times remain respectful to the Office and Obligations of Sovereign and shall demonstrate respect for and kindness for others, as we may seek respect to be shown to Us, even when such respect is not demonstrated to Us.

III. The Living Law

i. Justice is to honor the essence of the living law through due process in rendering judgment demonstrating fair remedy; and

ii.The highest respect that may be given to the law of any society is to respect due process of law in recognition of the rights of the law as a living entity, having its own valid personality; and

iii.The living law represents nothing less than the living spirit of our Divine Creator, whose words and commands form the basis of all Original law and jurisdiction; and

iv. It is by the very words and commands of our Divine Creator, that all men and women are bestowed the Office and Title of Sovereign at birth including Fixed and Irrevocable Title over their body, mind and spirit subject to Sovereign Law and that no force may lawfully abrogate any of these Rights, with or without our Consent; and

v. When due process is disrespected, the law suffers injury as any person may suffer harm from assault. All officers of the law are duty bound not to undertake such action that brings harm to the living law; and

vi. To deny a living man or woman their sovereign rights is to disrespect and injure the living law of the Divine Creator. In such circumstances, it is encumbered upon men and women to assert their rightful claim of sovereign rights and bring remedy on behalf of the law for its proper healing.

IV. Sacred Sovereign law

i. The highest of all legal standards are those bestowed to Us by our Divine Creator, also known as Unique Collective Awareness (UCA), being the Office and Title of Sovereign granted to all men and women at birth including Fixed and Irrevocable Title over their body, mind and spirit against which no force on Earth or Heaven may lawfully abrogate, with or without our Consent; and

ii. It is by this standard and because of this standard that all valid Original Sovereign law of all societies comes into being and that the valid law of Sovereign men and women represents nothing less than the living law of the Divine Creator existing over the whole Earth and See; and

iii. When sovereign men and women clearly pronouncing their Sovereign rights choose to associate as a Free Society under commonly accepted rules and by-laws, the second highest of all legal standards and instruments is that Charter and Covenant formed by such pronouncements of a free association of sovereign men and women; and

iv. When a free society of sovereign men and women is given the authority to issue legal instruments on behalf of all members of the free society according to its by-laws, then these legal instruments in the forms of letters, bonds, certificates and other forms represent the third highest of all legal standards.

v. Only law that recognizes the Sacred and Divine right of office bestowed upon each and every man and woman as free and sovereign beings may be regard as standard and original law as any law having such deficiency to seek to abrogate the sacred rights of all sovereign men and women is automatically null and voided from its first beginning because of its fatal error and therefore cannot possibly be original law; and

vi. Neither the age of a thing, nor its wide acceptance grants it exemption from the fact of what constitutes standard law and original law and what represents merely inferior and fatally flawed law. An ancient forgery remains a forgery, even if such forgeries are falsely claimed as standards. Neither does a unilateral statement represent a legal standard, no matter how high the claimed authority if it deliberately and openly contradicts the Office and Title of Sovereign granted to all men and women at birth including Fixed and Irrevocable Title over their body, mind and spirit subject to Sovereign Law.

V. Legal custom

i. A legal custom is any long-established practice resting on authority by long traditional of consent. A custom is also traditionally known as unwritten law; and

ii. Whilst a legal custom may have a long tradition, its lawfulness depends not upon history of constent nor age of origin but whether it it fundamentally consistent with recognizing the sovereign rights and obligations of all men and women; and

iii. Regardless of whether a custom may have a long tradition or wide acceptance, when such customs directly contradict the commands and authority of the Divine Creator and the Office of Sovereign bestowed upon all men and women, then such legal customs are rendered unlawful since the beginning of such customs; and

iv. The use of such legal customs as the writing of legal phrases in Latin, the stylized form of original sovereign law shall be as a legal courtesy and respect to the history of living law and not a requirement of demonstrating valid original law. The writing of a customary phrase in Latin no more makes it valid than if written or spoken in some other language.

VI. Court of Law

i. A Court of Law is any official gathering of three or more sovereign men and women under the by-laws of any free society recognizing their Sovereign rights for the adminstration of Justice by which one man or woman is consented to be the judge under demonstrated oath of obligation to the other sovereign men and women before them; and

ii. Unless a Court of law of any society complies with the above definition of a Court of law, such a place has no jurisdiction over living men or women and it cannot be correctly classed as a court of law, but a lesser body with little or no jurisdiction depending upon what rights it falsely claims; and

iii. No proper Court of law is permitted to so deliberately and willingly cause injury to the living law by seeking to treat sovereign men and woman as fictions (persons), denying the rights and obligations as bestowed by the Divine Creator to all men and women and abrogate due process of law. In such circumstances, it is encumbered upon men and women to assert their rightful claim of sovereign rights and bring remedy on behalf of the law within such a place for its proper healing.

VII. Judge

i. A Judge is any sovereign man or woman having taken a solemn oath to render such justice according to the by-laws of the free society is granted consent by any parties of sovereign men and women attending a Court of Law to hear their case and administer justice; and

ii. Unless a Judge demonstrates an oath before both parties to render fair justice prior to hearing case and unless both parties have given their consent, free of duress, then a man or woman claiming to be a judge holds no authority whatsoever to either hear the matter, nor render justice on behalf of the living law; and

iii. When a man or a woman holding no authority nor right as a judge falsely sits as a judge and refuses to swear an oath before each case to render fair justice, it must be logically concluded that no justice shall be served. Furthermore, any judgment rendered by a man or woman claiming to be a judge but refusing to swear an oath to render fair justice is automatically liable for challenge by any sovereign man or woman claiming their sovereign rights and obligations; and

iv. When a man or a woman holding no authority nor right as a judge falsely sits as a judge and hears matters before the court, they deliberately cause the gravest of all injury to the living law and contempt of due process of the law. In such circumstances, it is encumbered upon men and women to assert their rightful claim of sovereign rights and bring remedy on behalf of the law within such a place for its proper healing.

VIII. Right to Hold any Court

i. When any man or woman, having pronounced their Sovereign Rights and Oligations of Office as reflected in their Membership of a recognized Free Society then a Sovereign man or woman from that same Free Society has the absolute Sovereign Right to seek fair and superior remedy; and

ii. When the body of the Living Law has been injured by the failure of due process and/or the lack of respect of the law by Officers of a Society presenting no remedy or manifestly inferior remedy, then it is encumbered upon a Sovereign Man to give immediate notice of the intention to render judgment on fair remedy by due process to heal the living law; and

iii. When circumstances exist that a Sovereign man or woman is called upon in the Court of any society to render immediate notice of the render judgment on fair remedy, that Man or Woman instantly has the authorities and powers of a Judge conferred by Our Sovereign Law and Rights and at that instant they and they alone shall represent the Living Law representing the living grace of our Divine Creator in seeking fair remedy. All other living flesh and blood beings in that Court shall immediately bear witness to this authority and subject themselves to this authority as Judge of the Living law and right to immediately present fair remedy; and

iv. Once fair remedy has been rendered by a Sovereign man or woman being bestowed the authoritative powers of Judge, these powers shall cease until needed again as judgment has been rendered final and immediate effect must be given to orders; and

v. When such Orders do not truly represent fair remedy or when such Orders demonstrate any lack of respect for due process and respectful use of Rights and Powers, then such Judgments shall have no effect and such a Man or Woman must render themselves liable to some other to fairly render judgment.

IX. Attendance and representation

i. All Sovereign men and women have the absolute right to represent themselves at a Court of Law or to seek representation by any adult man and woman demonstrating competence of the by-laws of the society to which the man or woman claims membership and jurisdiction; and

ii. It remains the most ancient of rights known historically as Habaes Corpus of all men and women to be brought before a competent court of law no more than three days upon any charge against them and be presented with the facts as to the precise nature of the controversy, by whom it was brought and what evidence exists to support such claims; and

iii. Neither attendance, nor representations by an advocate before a Court represents consent by a sovereign man or woman to the jurisdiction of the court. Neither does attendance imply guilt nor cure antecedent irregularity of process, nor a defective service. Such claims to the contrary are patently illogical and false. Furthermore, it is encumbered upon the court, not the sovereign man or woman called before the court to demonstrate true jurisdiction; and

iv. It is a most solemn and ancient obligation of any valid court that when any man or woman, whether or not they claim their sovereign right, is brought before the court for the first time concerning a controversy that they are presented with the facts as to the precise nature of the controversy, by whom it was brought and what evidence exists to support such claims. To protect due process failure to produce any of these elements requires a competent court to dismiss the controvery.

X. Matter before the Court as contract

i. When any matter is brought before a court having proper jurisdiction over living men and women as sovereigns and when consent has been given by both parties for the matter to be heard by a judge and/or jury, a proper contract then exists between all parties to seek resolution by a judgment; and

ii. When duress is evident upon one party in bringing a matter before the court, whether it be by the presence of armed court officials, or the use of threat and intimidation, then no valid contract exists and no judgment on the matter can be considered to have been properly rendered as due process of law has not been followed; and

iii. When a controvery is brought before the court, it is encumbered upon the party that brings it to also bring to court immediate remedy. When the party that brings the controversy fails to bring immediate fair remedy, they knowingly or unknowingly injure the law and no judgment on the matter can be properly rendered unless the other party provides provides fair remedy and protects due process of the law.

XI. Knowledge and Disclosure

i. Ignorance of the law is no excuse for an officer of the Court as it is a solemn obligation of all Officers of the Court, not the parties before the court to be well versed in jurisprudence and therefore due process of law. Any claim to the contrary that seeks to shift both obligation and liability away from officers of the courts to living men and women who do not represent the court is an absurdity and deliberate corruption of ancient natural law; and

ii.When any controversy is brought before a valid court, the man or woman who brings the controversy is obligated to present full disclosure. When full disclosure is not provided, due process is not served and the matter must be dismissed. Failure to dismiss a matter of controversy in which those who brought the matter failed to fully disclose all the facts in their possession is a grave injury to the law. In such circumstances, it is encumbered upon men and women to assert their rightful claim of sovereign rights and bring remedy on behalf of the law within such a place for its proper healing.

XII. Judgment of Court

i. All men and women are considered innocent of an alleged controversy until due process is served according to the law and a liability (guilt) has been clearly established; and

ii. For Justice to be served, a judgment must represent fair remedy. The absence of fair remedy represents an absence of justice. Only when consent is given by both parties of sovereign men or women at the commencement of a case can fair remedy be properly served; and

iii. The fairest remedy and judgment is to offer both a remedy for negotiation and controversy in all matters, whether criminal or civil and for the party accused in the matter to choose whether to seek the remedy offered in negotiation or seek to defend themselves and avoid any remedy for controversy unless found liable.

XIII. Oaths and Court

i. The living law is present in a valid court of law when all words are given under oath. When officers of the court do not properly give oath, the living law is absent, even if all parties and witnesses show respect and due process of law; and

ii. An oath is only a valid oath when it is sworn in recognition of the sovereign rights of all men and women present within the court including the spirit of the living law and includes a pledge to speak honesty before the court. The touching of any object during such swearing is materially irrelevant to the validity of any oath; and

iii. A man or woman of good standing before the law is any sovereign man or woman having sworn an oath before the court, having been found to demonstrate respect for the living law and due process of law. Any claim of greater right or privilege of good standing beyond this ancient right cannot possibly exist. Even a judge regarded in a community of peers of high standing, who may refuse to swear their necessary oath before a case is guilty of a grave injury against the living law and must therefore be automatically considered of low standing; and

iv. No one shall be denied the right to swear and oath before a valid court; and

v. No one should be heard within a valid court unless they have previous sworn a valid oath for that case. Furthermore, no testimony in written or oral form is valid unless a valid oath has previously been sworn; and

vi. When information is presented to the court or read to the court by a man or woman of good standing, it is unlawful for the court to refuse such information to be read into evidence. When a judge refuses the word of a man or woman of good standing into evidence, they most gravely injure the law. In such circumstances, it is encumbered upon men and women to assert their rightful claim of sovereign rights and bring remedy on behalf of the law within such a place for its proper healing.

vii. The breaking of an oath, especially by any officer of the court, is a most serious offence which must be treated as the gravest of injury to the living law to which remedy must be immediately sought than the lesser notion of contempt.

XIV. Testimony

i. Nothing a woman or man says to any officer of the Court, unless it is under Oath in a court of law, free from duress can be used to convict them; and

ii. This most ancient right exists to both protect the sovereign rights of a man or woman from false evidence gained under duress and torture but most importantly to protect the integrity of the living law and justice. When any society degrades the importance of evidence under oath in a valid court of law in preference to the hearsay and information gained under duress, they gravely injure the body of law.

XV. Pleas

i. Silence by the court, not the parties of a case, is consent. This is because the court and its officers are obligated to know the law, not the parties before the court. Any attempt to shift this most ancient of understandings to being an assumed consent (by silence) of one or more parties before the courts is an absurdity and deliberate corruption of natural law. Any attempt by a court or court official to use such corruptions is a deliberate and heinous act against the living law and due process, with any such action automatically null and voided from its beginning; and

ii. Any witness before the courts who witnesses a claim before them and does not deny, therefore admits. However, without witnessing such a claim, even in silence, nothing can be rightfully concluded; and

iii. All sovereign men and women have the right to plead guilty, not guilty or demure to the court to immediately demand the court validate its jurisdiction. A court that denies the right to demure (validate its jurisdiction) is guilty of gross contempt of the law and due process and any action beyond that point is automatically unlawful and any judgment is therefore null and voided from the beginning; and

Upon this Pronouncement we recognize the inmmutable fact that Our Sovereign Right is derived from the demonstrated proof of our Divine Creator in Unique Collective Awareness (UCA) that we are both one and unique, whilst being part of the many, the collective of all Awareness. In so being, We have full right to Claim both the authority and powers bestowed by the Divine Creator; and

Upon this Prounouncement we recognize a further immutable fact that if any sovereign man or woman, living or deceased is not free, then We cannot rightly proclaim our Own freedom; and

Therefore upon this Pronouncement, warranted by Our Sovereign Right, upon necessity, We invoke both our freedom and these Rights for Ourselves and for and on behalf of all men and women, living or deceased, with the considerate judgment of all sovereign men and women living and deceased and the gracious favor of our common Divine Creator; and

I affirm all the above supreme law, AB INITIO (FROM THE BEGINNING),

On behalf of myself and other members who are associated with me by my hand and seal this day, [NO DATE REQUIRED]

In the truth ...

_____________________________________ (right thumb print in red ink)
[your name in lower case e.g. john harry or clan doe (autographed) in red ink]
De Jure Soli Sanguinis Coronae (Concerning the law of the Blood of Crowns/Sovereigns)