1. That a lawful enterprise was prevented from conducting business at the time of the offence; and

2. That the prevention of business caused the enterprise to sustain losses that otherwise would not normally have occurred; and

3. That the obstruction preventing lawful business of the enterprise was itself unlawful; and

4. That the actions of the accused contributed to the obstruction; and

5. That accused and any other men and women involved in the obstruction were warned that their action was unlawful and called to withdraw; and

6. That accused did not comply to the warning as instructed in the time instructed.

Type	Condition(s)
1-3	a) if total value of lost business is less than 1 times annual average wages;
4-6	a) if total value of lost business is more than 1 times and less than 4 times annual average wages;

Type	Condition(s)
1-3	a) if total value of lost business is more than 4 times and less than 8 times annual average wages;
4-6	a) if total value of lost business is more than 8 times and less than 12 times annual average wages;

Type	Condition(s)
1-3	a) if total value of lost business is more than 12 times and less than 30 times annual average wages;
4-6	a) if total value of lost business is more than 30 times annual average wages;